|
(12-12-03)
The Dow and the SP, have broken out and held above resistance,
in addition, all indicators are above zero and rising.
Consequently we ought to expect continuation to the upside, in
the absence of any exogenous event that upsets the market. What
could that be? We got three different forces that are pulling on
the other direction, oil, interest rates, and the dollar (see
charts below) So far, the equity markets have been able to
overcome the "opposite pull." Will they be able to
continue so, if oil went over $35, and the dollar index
below 85 for example? We do not know, but it is something that
certainly needs to be kept in mind. Pay attention to the 10100
level in the Dow, and 1085 in the SP, for a reversal, if that
doesn't happen, they are heading to the first upside targets.
(12-05-03)
The indices broke support marginally, three weeks ago, and
subsequently they have spent the last 12-15 trading days
rallying back up to the support line that they violated 3 weeks
ago. After making contact with the previous support line
-which now represents resistance- they pulled back, but only
modestly. As it can be easily seen both from the
price charts (please see page one) and from the indicator
charts, the indices are still "coiling."
In other words, they are building energy for their next move,
which should be either a break-out, or, a break-down.
Unfortunately, there is plenty of evidence that can objectively
support both scenarios almost equally. On one hand we have
outlandish bullish sentiment (AAII had 69% bulls, and the
Consensus Inc., 72% bulls this past week) deteriorating
liquidity, ample signs of distribution, risk premiums at
multi-year lows, several non-confirmations, and geopolitical
uncertainty, on the other hand, we have strong breadth,
exceptionally strong 52 week highs/lows ratio, favoring the
highs, and a chart pattern that in several occasions
in the past, has resulted in upside break-outs. Take
a look at the charts below for example:
Notice
that a similar chart pattern for the NDX, accompanied with
similar investor psychology, going into the end of 1999,
resulted in the blow off top in March of 2000. Do the
similarities "guarantee" a repetition? Of course, not.
However, because the similarities are there, as long as price
continues to hold above support, one can not dismiss the
possibility of a break-out.
Take
a look at the Transportation Index, notice that the exact same
chart pattern resulted in a break out in case B, and C,
and in a break-down in case A. Consequently, it should be rather
clear, that neither outcome at this point can be dismissed. If
price starts to break down, and new daily lows start to exceed
daily highs, and the number of stocks above their 200 DMA
drops below 60%, from currently 85%, and so on, then one
can say that the evidence is shifting in support of a
break-down. On the other hand, if the indices continue to
hold above support and investors remain enamored with
equities, who can rule out another buying stampede? Until
the body of evidence starts to shift in clear favor of
one of the two outcomes, we ought to remain neutral
and allow for either scenario to take place.
Our
own personal belief -as we also stated in the monthly report- is
that the markets can continue higher -in the absence of an
outside crisis- but they are vulnerable, and they are ill
equipped to deal with the un-expected, such as, higher oil
prices, or, a currency crisis, or, a sharp rise in short
term interest rates, or, all of the above. We further
believe that if the markets started to decline, the
decline will be quite fast and will not allow an orderly
exit, due to the fact that many portfolio managers will
liquidate positions in order to lock in, this year's
gains.
For
next week, we need to contemplate mainly two scenarios:
A)
If the indices continue lower for the first 2-3 days
of the week, and they make contact with the support levels
listed in the table below, the McClellan Oscillators, as well
as, many of our own short-term trading indicators will
reach oversold territory, and thus we should get a bounce
later in the week.
B)
If the indices rally on Monday, the key thing will be whether
they can close above last week's highs, if they do, then the
rally can carry into the end of the week. If they stumble once
again, then we would expect selling to resume by Thursday.
Pay
attention to support and resistance, short-term traders
ought to buy at support if it holds, and sell short at
resistance if it holds. However, we continue to believe
that the best way to position for either a break-out, or, a
break-down is thru the use of straddles, or, strangles for
the QQQ, expiring in January, February, or
even March.
A
potential market moving event this week can be the FOMC meeting
and the language they adopt. The FED has stated that it
intents to keep current interest rate policy for a
"considerable period of time." Given the strong GDP,
and ISM numbers, it would be difficult for the FED to defend the
notion that the risk of economic contraction is such that
warrants real interest rates to remain negative. Consequently,
if they decide to remove the phrase "considerable period of
time" from their statement, then holders of
short-term Treasuries may get spooked and decide to bail out,
out of fear that the FED will begin to raise rates, sooner, than
later. Such an outcome will result in higher short-term
interest rates, a rally in the dollar, and a decline in gold
prices. Normally, such a shift would also impact equities
adversely, although the Wall Street propaganda machine
will try to portray higher short term interest rates as a
"good thing" because it means the economy is
improving, which in turn will result in "untold
riches" for corporations, which in turn will
result in "significantly" higher stock prices, and
thus, investors ought to be buying now, no questions
asked! Consequently, they may manage to get a rally out of
this, but we wouldn't bet on it.
(11-21-03)
The indices broke below support but only marginally, moreover,
the breakdown didn't result in a downward acceleration, in fact
the indices seem to stabilize, while almost every indicator
reached the level that in the past 3 months has served as a
"floor." If the overall bullish environment remains
intact, one would expect that the indices will rally from
current levels, imitating their previous behavior of the last 3
months, resulting in yet another leg up. Is the overall bullish
environment still intact? Let's take a look at the
inflows/outflows charts.
Notice
that we got a negative cross-over, outflows exceeded
inflows. We did have a brief cross-over in mid-July for the
NYSE, which was quickly reversed (point AA') If this turns out
to be the case again, then Friday's action by both price
and indicators would represent yet another buy signal, and we
would expect the indices to embark on another advance. However,
if we don't get another reversal, and outflows continue to
exceed inflows, then the decline is not over, and in fact
it can accelerate rapidly. We have no way of determining whether
the equity markets will get another liquidity infusion next
week, reversing the cross-over, we can only report to you what
the liquidity situation is. Next week could mark the beginning
of another advance, or, the long awaited demise of the rally
that started last March. Given that this is a holiday shortened
week, we may not see a dramatic move until the following
one. In the mean time we shall pay close attention to the hourly
charts.
Notice
that intra-day support has held, in fact -in the case of the SP-
it can fall to 1020, and the intra-day trend will still be
positive. Also notice that a similar pattern in October
resulted in a sizable advance. Given that the markets are
relatively oversold, and intra-day support has held, we could
easily see buyers coming in first thing on Monday, if they can
take the indices above resistance (see table below) then we can
expect continuation, even if the rally ultimately fails next
week due to lack of liquidity. One thing that needs to be kept
in mind is that during times of negative liquidity, the markets
do bounce when they get oversold, but because there is not
enough liquidity to sustain the bounce, it ends up being a few
days affair. The markets are oversold right now, thus a
bounce is in the cards.
In
summary, last Friday many indicators reached levels that in the
past few months have generated reliable "ENTRY"
signals. However, this time it may be different, liquidity
has turned negative and unless it quickly reverses, we
will see the first meaningful decline since last January.
(11-14-03)
Both the
price charts and the indicator charts are demonstrating
loud and clear that the markets have been coiling for
several weeks, building energy for the next move. Given that the
coiling/consolidation has been going on since early September,
we must assume that the markets have accumulated enough
energy to support a move with a magnitude of at least
8%-10%. Furthermore, given that the indices are at the apex of
their formations, we ought to expect the initiation of the move
to take place very shortly, in fact from our observation of
similar patterns over the years, we estimate that it should
happen within the next 5-7 trading days. So, if a "breaK"
is imminent, what is the most likely direction? Let's take a
look at the charts below.
Notice
that while NASDAQ and the SP are at the top of their range, the
US dollar is at the bottom of its range, and oil is once again
at key resistance. If the dollar is able to hold support, and
oil fails to overcome resistance, then, one can argue that
the chances of the equity markets breaking out to the upside,
will be enhanced. However, If the dollar sinks further,
while oil prices break out to the upside, it would be hard
to imagine that the equity markets will break out on the upside,
as well! The fact that these four indices are at exact opposite
points, illustrates -in our view- the great disconnect between
the equity markets and the rest of the asset classes. Equity
investors appear convinced that the currency and energy
markets will not hold any surprises going forward. If they are
correct, then we ought to see the dollar holding support, and
oil retreating. However, if equity investors are wrong in their
assumptions, then the equity markets are quite vulnerable at
this juncture, and we would expect the resolution to be on the
downside. Furthermore, take a look at the charts for the HUI,
and the Nikkei.
Notice
that the negative correlation between the dollar and
gold/gold stocks has held remarkably well. Every top in the
dollar has also marked a simultaneous bottom in gold/gold
stocks. Notice that the HUI thrusted to the upside in
mid-July, rallying from 140 to 180 in a matter of seven weeks,
and it has spent the last 10 weeks moving in a rising channel.
The chart pattern suggests a high-end consolidation, which
should result to a break-out and a rally to the 250-260 zone. It
may not happen, however, if it does happen, more likely it will
happen because the dollar broke down. In other words, the
strength in the HUI implies that the dollar may not hold
after all. In addition, the Nikkei -which supposedly had
finally found a bottom- has lost 8.8% in just 15 trading days,
and it is testing critical support in the 10150-9950 zone. If
that support doesn't hold, then the Nikkei can be expected to
fall to the 9150-9250 zone, losing another 9.8%. It is
reasonable to expect that another 10% decline in the Nikkei,
will have an adverse impact on the Asian markets. Given the
positive correlation between the US equity markets and the
markets in the Pacific Rim area, it is hard to imagine a
scenario in which the US equity markets break to the
upside, while Taiwan, Hong-Kong, Japan, Malaysia, etc., are
breaking down.
The
point we are trying to get across is this: the equity
markets should experience a sharp move relatively shortly,
with a minimum magnitude of 8%-10%. The markets have been in an
uptrend, and as of the close on Friday, support has not been
violated, and thus by definition the trend is still UP. The
indices have been consolidating for the past 10 weeks, and the
consolidation is manifested in the formation of an
"ascending triangle" -although some will argue that it
is a "wedge." Given that the intermediate trend is up,
and ascending triangles tend to be bullish formations, the odds
ought to favor a bullish resolution. However, one can not
examine the price behavior of one asset class in isolation,
without taking into consideration the overall environment.
The price behavior of oil, gold, and the dollar, has been
diametrically opposed to that one of equities, and at the same
time, equities, oil, gold, and the dollar are either at critical
support, or, at critical resistance levels implying that SOMETHING
HAS TO GIVE. It could very well be, that the price
of oil gives, and the dollar finds support and rallies
handsomely, and equities break out to the upside. However, how
about if the dollar tanks, oil goes over $37.5 per barrel, and
international markets break-down, will the U.S. equity markets
be able to break-out on the upside rewarding investors who have
been buying U.S. stocks the last 3-4 months, in anticipation
of such outcome? Any reasonable investor -under such
circumstances- will at least consider the possibility that the
U.S. equity markets will break down as well.
In
summary, when everything is taken into consideration, the
overall picture is neutral. For the near future, Investors need
to pay attention not only to how the U.S. equity markets
are behaving, but also to other asset classes, such us
commodities, and currencies, and also other major equity markets
from overseas. If the equity markets overcome resistance
while the dollar is falling and oil is rallying, we would stand
aside, because the break out may turn out to be a false one.
However, if resistance is overcome while oil, and the
dollar behave, then we would initiate a pilot 10%-15% long
position. On the other hand, we would initiate pilot short
positions of 20%-25% if the SP was to close below 1044.
For next week, be prepared for a break, pay attention to the
support/resistance levels listed below, and keep an eye on the
action by oil, gold, the dollar and the Nikkei.
(11-7-03)
The
indices traded in a narrow range thru-out the week, in a manner
indicative of a bullish consolidation. However, despite
"stellar economic news" the indices were unable to
break to the upside, which is an indication that all the
"good news" are possibly already priced in, and thus
the market has run out of fuel. We got three pieces of
information that are somewhat
-but not totally- supportive
of this argument.
First,
the total assets in the RYDEX bull funds are clearly in sell
territory, but that doesn't mean they can not go even higher!
Second,
the SP finished the month of August at 1008, and NASDAQ finished
at 1810. A month later, On September 30th, the SP closed at 996,
for a net loss of 1.2%, and NASDAQ closed at 1787, for a net
loss of 1.3%. Remarkably, during the same period mutual funds
took in $17.2b. In the following month, the SP closed at 1050 at
the end of October, for a gain of 5.4%, and NASDAQ closed at
1932, for a gain of 8.1%. However, during the month of October,
mutual funds took in $32b, twice as much! What's the point? The
point is, it is becoming increasingly difficult for the market
to achieve new gains, despite the huge amounts of inflows.
Apparently an increasing number of investors is selling into the
rally. This type of action, is absorbing a big part of
the new money that is coming in, making it difficult
for the market to advance.
Third,
we got several divergences which usually are indicative of
market that is overdue for a correction.
Consequently,
the combination of all the above, does raise legitimate concerns
about the sustainability of the rally, and the market's ability
to continue much higher. However, there is one piece of the
puzzle that it is still missing; price
is holding above support, which means the trend is still UP! Moreover,
although there has been increased selling into the rally,
liquidity is still positive, there is more money coming in, than
money going out. To sum it up, the overall environment is still
supportive of higher prices, however, the risk of an abrupt end
has been heightened, and in fact, if the current rate of
deterioration persists, we may see the indices finally rolling
over within the next 9-12 trading days, even if the
"roll-over" comes from higher levels, like the first
upside targets listed on the table below. For next week, once
again, we got to let price be the determining factor of our
actions. A close below support, would imply a further decline to
the first downside targets, while a close above resistance,
would imply further strength.
(10-31-04)
We got the bounce the indicators were suggesting, and now the
overall technical picture has turned neutral, with all the
indicators above zero, but diverging negatively. Given that
price is holding above support, and acting well, the bias is on
the upside, however, the upside potential is no more than 5% in
the SP and the Dow, and no more than 8%-8.5% in NASDAQ. These
are good percentage gains for short-term traders who are willing
to take the risk. Notice that the total assets in the
RYDEX bull funds, and the RYDEX bear funds are now in SELL
territory. For next week, we need to pay attention to what takes
place early on, especially Monday. We got two zones to pay
attention to, in order to get clues about the market's
short-term direction: 9825-9785 for the Dow, and 1055-1045 for
the SP. If these two indices trade above -and more importantly-
close above the upper boundary of the zone, the short-term bias
will remain on the upside. On the other hand, If these two
indices trade below -and more importantly- close below the lower
boundary of the zone, the short-term bias will shift to the
downside.
(10-24-03)
Last week we saw modestly
lower prices on increasing volume. In addition, all the
indicators that we follow are near the bottom of their
range, suggesting that although lower prices are possible -due
to the technical deterioration- somewhere between Friday's
closing levels and 3% lower, we ought to expect a bounce, even
if it is a trading one. For this coming week, if the
markets tank early on, we would expect a bounce later in the
week. On the other hand, if the market rallies on Monday, things
will get a bit more tricky. If that happens, the key thing is
whether the bounce stalls at resistance. If the indices just
close the gaps and stall, then we ought to expect a resumption
of the decline by mid-week. Something else that we would like to
bring to your attention is the RYDEX ratios. Since March,
none of the other traditional sentiment indicators have had any
predictive power. On the other hand, we can clearly see a sell
zone, and a buy zone when it comes to
the short term from the asset levels of all the BEAR RYDEX funds
combined.
Notice, that every time the total amount in the bear funds
reached approximately $2b, the market rallied, and every
time the total amount in the bear funds reached $1.5b-$1.2b, the
market declined (SEE CHART ON THE BOTTOM) Right now, the total
amount is about $1.75b, which is right in the middle of its most
resent range, indicating, that as far as this indicator is
concerned, the market can go either wayin the short term.
However, it gets
more interesting for the intermediate term. Notice that
when it comes to the intermediate
term, the total assets in the BULL RYDEX funds combined,
can provide valuable clues, as well. The total asset
levels in the BULL RYDEX funds, are in the "sell
zone." (SEE CHART IN THE MIDDLE) In other words, from a
sentiment point of view, if we use the RYDEX funds as a guide,
we must conclude that in the short term, the market can
either way, but in the intermediate term, it is making a top.
Does it make sense that the Bull funds tend to be more accurate
for the intermediate term, while the bear funds tend to be
more accurate for the short term? ABSOLUTELY! The reason is,
most of the people who trade the bear funds, tend to be short
term speculators, which isn't the case with the bull funds.
(10-10-03)Last week we saw modestly
higher prices while at the same time the technical picture
deteriorated, as evidenced by the many divergences. This is
pretty much what one would expect as the market approaches a top
of significance, with the exception of money flows. Inflows
continue to exceed outflows by a comfortable margin. The
steep divergences suggest that the advance could come to a halt,
however, with inflows exceeding outflows, the
overall picture is neutral forcing us to place great
emphasis on resistance, bullish above 1050 for the SP, and
bullish above 1950 for NASDAQ. Going into next week we must pay
attention to the combination of higher oil prices, and a
lower dollar. So far, the stock market has ignored both, but
will the market continue to ignore oil prices above $35.00? We
don't know, and neither does anybody else -especially those
charlatans who steadfastly claim that they do! The risk is in
the unknown.
In
addition, the "neutral" picture created by the
combination of negative technical divergences and positive money
flows, can also be observed in the charts, especially the one of
the SP500. Notice that the current pattern could be either an
ascending triangle, targeting 1105, or, a "broadening
top" targeting 960. If the momentum readings we got 5
weeks ago were indicative of a new intermediate term advance,
then the current chart pattern will turn out to be one of an
ascending triangle, if on the other hand, the momentum readings
we got 5 weeks ago were indicative of a terminal phase of the
rally from the March lows, then the current chart
pattern will turn out to be one of a broadening top. At this
point -from a quantitative point of view- the odds are almost
even, because the negative technical divergence are offset by
the positive money flows. For next week we will use the
1050-1025 zone in the SP, as our "neutral zone" we
stay neutral in between, we turn bullish on a close
above 1050, and bearish on a close below 1025.
(10-3-03)
Last week's advance shouldn't have surprised any of our
subscribers, we talked about it two weeks ago, and again last
week. The key thing is whether we get continuation, or, not. On
that front, our assessment is that investors ought to
maintain a guarded optimism. Back on 8-29-03 (see extra
for 8-29-03) we pointed out that the momentum readings
generated that week, were consistent with either the beginning
of a multi-month advance, or, with the terminal phase of the
ongoing rally. If what we were dealing with, was the terminal
phase of the rally that had started in March, we would expect
this phase to last 3-5 weeks, bringing an end to the rally in
the first part of October.
So,
last week's action fits perfectly, both with what we said six
weeks ago, and with what we said the previous two weeks.
However, The readings that we got so far, are inconclusive with
regards to answering the question whether last week's rally was
the "last act." The Quantifiers turned positive but
not by much, the TIs, show the trend to be neutral, the
McClellan Oscillators for NASDAQ, hardly made it above the zero
line. In other words, there is enough improvement to warrant
optimism, but not enough to warrant full confidence. For this
coming week, we ought to pay attention to last week's highs. If
the SP manages to get above 1040, then the 1065-1075 should be
achievable. If the 1040 resistance stops the SP's advance, then
in all likelihood the rally that started in March, is for all
means and purposes, over.
|