|
WEEKLY COMMENTARY Q3-2000
INDEX
"End
Of The Week Market Update" for week ending 9-29-00
We ended September's Newsletter saying "... If
indeed the economy has slowed to about 3.5% (annual
growth) in the third quarter, corporate profits will
show it!" As the past couple of weeks have
demonstrated, corporate profits have been reflecting the
economic slowdown, and the market has responded with a
vengeance! Obviously, the question in everybody's mind
is whether we've seen the bottom. We think not. The
reasons behind our rationale are these: 1) the market
-from a technical point- is oversold, however, technical
conditions can not overcome deterioration in
fundamentals. What we mean by that, is simply that just
because a stock, or an index, are "technically
oversold" that does not mean they can not get even
more oversold, if their fundamental outlook is
worsening. MU, INTC, AAPL, (to name a few) were already
"oversold" but that did not stop the stocks
from losing another 25%-50% of their value. NASDAQ was
deeply oversold going into the week in April that lost
over 700 points. The perception among institutional
investors -who are doing the selling- is that the
economic picture has changed. When we deal witha market
whose fundamentals are unchanged, then you can count on
moving from overbought to oversold conditions with
regularity as indicated by most technical indicators
that measure such conditions. That is not true when
fundamentals change. The earnings warnings have come
from across the board, cyclicals, consumer, retail,
technology, meaning the problems are not industry
specific, and they are not company specific (unlike what
you hear on CNBC!) 2) We find it very discouraging that
the small investor has been feverishly buying the dips.
We follow several sentiment indicators which track the
sentiment of institutional, and individual investors. We
would like to share one of those indicators with you. It
is the "Ameritrade Index" (It can be found at
http://www.ameritradeindex.com/learn_more.html) The
index is compiled by Ameritrade and it indicates the
percentage of net buyers, on a daily basis, among its
customers. Ameritrade is a favorite of individual
investors and a favorite of small speculators.According
to Ameritrade these are the percentages of net buyers
the last seven days: 9-21:72.18%, 9-22:82.57%,
9-25:86.49%, 9-26:82.50%, 9-27:71.89%, 9-28%35.79%,
9-29:86.63% As you notice, in a period that the market
was down 5 out of seven days, 4 out of 5 individual
investors were net buyers! We have never seen a bottom
in which people were net buyers! There has been no fear
among individual investors, and they are trying to buck
the trend by buying into institutional selling. There is
no way, individual investors can stem the tremendous
volume on the sell side, being offered by institutions.
Unless, institutional investors, stop selling, the
market won't find a bottom. Unless, individual
investors, stop being wildly bullish, the market will
not find a bottom (keep in mind, that there is more
selling on the way from institutional investors, due to
taxes and repositioning of funds) 3) The OEX put/call
ratio is at .53, usually bottoms come when the ratio is
between 1.5-2.0, the CBOE equity put/call ratio is at
.49, usually bottoms come when the ratio 1.0-1.5 Again,
there has been no fear or real bearishness, which
usually mark market bottoms. 4) The uncertainties of the
coming election have not even been discounted by the
market. Keep in mind that Mr. Gore has attacked about
80% of the SP500!, despite that over 50% of Americans
are stock owners, he is slightly ahead in the polls.
Worse off, there is a real threat that the next Speaker
of the House will be R. Gerphardt. With both the
legislative and the executive branch in the hands of
democrats, we can not see the market blossoming. As much
as Mr. Clinton would like to take credit for the
market's spectacular advance during his Presidency, the
truth is, the market took off after the November 1994
Congressional Elections, when Democrats lost control of
both Chambers!
"End Of The Week Market Update" for week
ending 9-22-00
The week that just ended has left, unanswered, the
question whether the markets have bottomed yet. The
erosion in prices that we have seen across the board,
thru-out the month, is indicative not only of the poor
technical condition of the equity markets, but also, of
the deteriorating fundamentals. Most "experts"
have been expecting a rather healthy and robust second
quarter. This assumption is now coming under doubt. It
is not just our own economy that shows signs of a
turndown, but also, the economies of our trading
partners that have weakened as well. The high oil
prices, the faltering Asian equity markets, and the
defacto flat capital spending in Europe, can not be
construed as simple noise in the background. We believe
the markets will gyrate until, 3rd quarter earnings are
out, and investors can finally make up their minds about
the direction, and magnitude, of future earnings growth.
For now, it appears that the markets may have put in a
short-term bottom -given Friday's perfomance. We think
this probably more true for the DJIA and the SP500, than
the NASDAQ. As we have mentioned the last few days, we
find particularly suspicious the upward accelaration in
a handful of stocks such as EXTR, JNPR,BRCD, NEWP, (CIEN
especially) etc. When a small number of stocks appear to
be embarking on a parabolic run, just when the rest of
the market is tanking, is never a good sign. When a
stock goes parabolic, right before earnings are due,
invariably speaking, it always goes down, even if the
earnings are as expected. In any case, given how
oversold the markets have been, we do not rule out a
counter trend rally, which it will probably be worth
participating into. We are simply not sure, if that
counter trend rally started on Friday!
CHARTS ARE VIEWABLE ONLY DURING THE CURRENT WEEK
"End Of The Week Market Update" for week
ending 9-15-00
Those of you who have been following us on a regular
basis (thru the newsletter, the weekly and daily
updates) were not surprised at all to see the markets
deteriorate as much as they did this past week. We have
repeatedly pointed out the underlying weaknesses in all
the major indexes(DJIA,NASDAQ,SP500) The question at
this point is this: "the indexes are near support
levels, are those levels going to hold?" We believe
that initially they will. In all likelihood the markets
will find a bottom on Monday, and they will make an
attempt to rally for 2-3 days. If that recovery rally
folds, then the support levels will be violated by the
end of next week. If you look at the two WAVG Aggregate
Indicators for both the SP500 and NASDAQ, they are not
at the bottom, but they are very close to it, usually at
this level we get a small rally, then the market turns
back down again for another 2-3 days, and in that case
the indicators bottom out. One thing to keep in mind, is
this: while small investors were buying technology
stocks in August -thinking the market will shoot to the
moon in September- institutional investors have been
unloading the very same stocks since mid-July, and they
are still selling. Unless there is some institutional
buying, the small investors can not sustain any rally by
themselves. In addition, although NASDAQ, is down almost
10%, many of the stocks that need to correct (JNPR,PWER,NWEP,BRCD,CIEN,EXTR,AMCC
etc)are still near their highs. Therefore, we believe
the correction may not end, unless those stocks with the
oversize gains experience some losses as well.
Furthermore, the collapse of leading tech stocks such as
INTC, MU, HWP, does speak volume about to the precarious
situation of technology stocks(ie NASDAQ). The SP500 is
rather vulnerable as well. It could get hit hard, by
both declining tech shares, and, profit taking in
financial, energy and utility stocks. The situation will
begin to clear sometime early October when the actual
3rd Quarter earnings reports begin to come out, but by
then, the damage might be already done. On another note,
we would like to make two comments, one concerning the
Dow, the other concerning ORCL. It is universaly known
that most Dow stocks, are multinational, cyclical
companies. Which any slow down in the economy affects
their earnings, a strong dollar also affects their
earnings, high energy prices affect their earnings as
well. Given that everybody agrees the economy has slowed
down, crude has been hovering around $32-$34 a barrel,
and the euro keeps making new lows every day, why in the
world, would anybody be surprised by earnings shortfalls
in Dow companies? That should have been a foregone
conclusion, therefore, anybody losing money from
declining prices in Dow stocks, gets no sympathy from
us! The same holds true for ORCL. Wishfull amateurs were
buying the stock ahead of its earnings report, betting
that good earnings will propel the stock even higher.
When it tanked after what was seemingly a spectacular
earnings report, people were at a loss to explain why.
Here is the reason why: the stock over the past year has
appreciated almost 300%, it currently trades at 120
times earnings, although its growth is above average,
ORCL is a mature company, meaning it will not have
exponential growth in the future (near or far) to
warrant such an extravagant absurd valuation. At 120
times earnings, for a company the size of ORCL, the
price reflects every possible good scenarios that people
can think of, and even scenarios people can't think of
yet! So, when the earnings report came out,
institutional investors decided this was as good as it
gets and they dumped the stock. That should have been no
surprise either. Thus, those who were buying ORCL on
Wed. and Thursday, and now they're feeling sorry for
themselves, they also do not get any sympathy from
us![WE APOLOGIZE IF OUR LAST TWO COMMENTS OFFENDED
ANYBODY, WE ARE ONLY TRYING TO MAKE A POINT!]
CHARTS ARE VIEWABLE ONLY DURING THE CURRENT WEEK
"End Of The Week Market Update" for week
ending 9-1-00
Something really noteworthy took place last week, which
has the potential to change the outlook of the market in
a dramatic way. We have said repeatedly that NASDAQ can
not continue higher unless more stocks participate in
the rally. In fact our timing model gave a
"sell" signal on the assumption that the rally
would continue under the same conditions (which could
not go much further with only 75-100 stocks responsible
for 80% of the gains) However, for the first time since
April, the A/D line has turned around in earnest. Last
week we saw second-tier stocks participating in the
advance. If this continues, then we will turn very
bullish on NASDAQ. One week only, it is not enough to
draw conclusions, especially during a week that was
dominated by low volume, and the rollover of futures
contracts. Nevertheless, it was a very positive week! On
the other hand, our WAVG Aggregate Index, shows that
NASDAQ might be at the top of its range. However, it has
been our empirical observation, that when NASDAQ is
launching a new multi-month rally, this indicator
becomes "overbought" (as it appears to be now)
during the initial upward thrust, but that does not mean
the market turns down. If the improvement in the A/D
line continues, then the "overbought" reading
of the indicator needs to be ignored, because the market
is just getting started. If the improvement in the A/D
line, was a one-week event, then the overbought reading
of the indicator is valid, and the recent rally is
pretty much done. Remember what we said last week, if
NASDAQ has topped out for good, the next stop will be
1650-1750.
CHARTS ARE VIEWABLE ONLY DURING THE CURRENT WEEK
"End Of The Week Market Update" for week
ending 8-25-00
In our daily market updates on 8-25-00 (before the
opening, see "daily updates") we said that
after the close on 8-24-00 our indicators gave a
"sell" signal. We then added "...that
does not mean the market is going to start a decline
today -although it might- What it means is that, over
the next 1-5 trading days, a short -and maybe
intermediate- term top should be in place..." We
feel very strongly that the market could experience a
one to two day sharp advance over the next few days, but
we do not believe that would mark the start of another
advance, rather, it will mark the end of the current
one. The real question is this: Have the markets, and
especially NASDAQ, topped out not only short and
intermediate term, but also long-term. If that is the
case, you should expect NASDAQ 1650-1750 sometime in mid
2001, and if things really get out of hand 1100-1000
sometime in 2002. Some of you may think that we are
smoking something that is probably illegal! Well,
we assure you we are not! We hope we are wrong, but we
let time prove that.As evidenced by the charts below (see Wavg
Aggregate Index, which measures the overall strength of
the market) the market for the past two weeks has been
"coiling" in low volume. Historically, this
kind of behavior has resulted in a sharp short advance,
followed by a 2-3 week decline, or, a sharp short
decline, followed by a 2-3 week advance! Many of the
leading stocks -that have carried the current advance-
are over-extended, thus we fail to see how the market
can move higher -for another 3-4 weeks- without any
profit taking. Most importantly, the current run-up in
prices has been mainly due to speculation, rather than
conviction. Two glaring examples were in full display
last week regarding ASTM and EMLX. The National Health
Institute, early in the week, announced that it would
recommend the use of embryos in research. The two stocks
with the largest advances were ASTM and STEM (we owned
STEM in our managed accounts, and we sold on Friday at
$11.00)STEM legitimately advanced because it is one of
the pioneers in the field which stands to gain the most
from the lift in the ban of using embryos for research.
On the other hand, ASTM which had the largest advance,
DOES NOT use embryos in its research, in fact it has
nothing to gain from any change in policy! Yet the stock
jumped 250%! Obviously speculators were buying simply
because the stock was "moving" and they had no
knowledge of the company's prospects. Another example
was the fiasco over EMLX on Friday. On Wed. and Thursday
EMLX moved sharply, building on recent gains. On Friday
the stock opened at 112 and within one hour had plunged
to 48, due to a bogus news release regarding the
company. If people had been buying EMLX on conviction in
the company's prospects, they would have been skeptical
of the news release, and at the very least, they would
have checked its accuracy before dumping the stock. That
was not the case, as fast as speculators had piled on
the stock earlier in the week, that much faster they
exited the stock, causing it to plunge 68% in less than
an hour. Eventually, it was revealed that the "news
release" was a "hoax" and the FBI is
looking for the perpetrator...! The point here is
simple, these two are not isolated incidents. Short-term
speculators have driven prices up the past two weeks,
making the market very vulnerable to a sharp decline if
more buyers do not come in to drive prices higher. The
problem is, we do not know, how many market
participants, will be willing to step up to he plate,
buying EXTR, CIEN, BRCD, BRCM, etc., near or at, all
time highs...
CHARTS ARE VIEWABLE ONLY DURING THE CURRENT WEEK
"End Of The Week Market Update" for week
ending 8-18-00
On the surface, not a whole a lot took place this week.
All of our indicators for the SP500 continue to
fluctuate around the zero line (see August newsletter
for more details) indicating that volatility should pick
up substantially in the next one to two weeks. Momentum
indicators have turned slightly negative, raising the
likelihood that the volatility will be on the downside,
but we do not have enough evidence to be reasonably
certain about it. Similarly , Nasdaq is also in the same
predicament. We would like to concentrate on the A/D
line, because we do think it holds the key to the
near-term direction of Nasdaq. Clearly the recent
decline on the A/D line has been arrested the last two
weeks. That means two things: first the advance of the
past two weeks, had no following from the broad market,
consequently, it is not sustainable. Second, if the
40-50 big cap stocks that are responsible for almost 80%
of the point gains, become subjects to profit taking,
then there is floor undernearth to provide support (the
next 10%-15% move will be on the downside) On the other
hand,if the A/D line begins to advance, then the rally
can go on for several weeks. Which one of the two is
going to take place? Again, since momentum indicators
have turned slightly negative, the odds favor a roll
over of the A/D line along with the index. If more
stocks do not participate, we are CERTAIN that BRCM,
BRCD, EXTR, CIEN etc., (the " crowd pleasers")
will not be able to carry Nasdaq all by themselves to
another 15%-20% advance from current levels. At this
point, sitting it out for 5-10 days, until the picture
becomes more clear, is probably the best and safest
approach.
CHARTS ARE VIEWABLE ONLY DURING THE CURRENT WEEK
"End Of The Week Market Update" for week
ending 8-4-00 This week we have posted a couple of
charts, such as the Volatility model and the WAVG of
Deviations chart, which normally we don't post, so,
we'll take a little time to explain how they work and
what they mean. We'll start with the Volatility model
for the SP500. As you see, it has been rather accurate
in identifying bottoms and tops for the SP500 (it is NOT
designed to work with Nasdaq)It moves between 1.1 and
.9,on average -with .8 and 1.2 being the extreme levels-
When it is at 1,it means the DIRECTION of volatility is
neutral. In conjuction with this model, we also employ a
5 day ROC. If the model is moving upwards and its ROC is
increasing, that means, higher volatility with POSITIVE
bias lies ahead. If the model is either topping or
bottoming while the ROC is diminishing, that means, the
current bias of volatility is about to change. If the
model is moving down while its ROC is increasing, it
means, higher volatility with NEGATIVE bias lies ahead.
The opposite hold true for the opposite set of
circumstances. Currently, the model is near the top of
its range, and it is pointing up. Thus, the SP500
probably has a little more left on the upside, but we
would not expect anything noteworthy. The other chart
-for Nasdaq- depicts how far price has deviated from a
series of regression lines of different time
intervals(5, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 day)The degrees of
deviation between price and the regression lines are
averaged -on a weighted- basis to come up with the chart
that you're viewing. It also has been rather accurate in
identifying tops and bottoms. More recently, it
correctly identified the bottom that Nasdaq put in last
Friday. Currently, the indicator is moving up, but its
rate of change is decreasing, meaning, Nasdaq can go
higher, but it is running out of steam. That is also
confirmed, by the choppy action of the market, and its
generally poor breadth and leadership. There has been a
steady out-flow of funds from Nasdaq listed
semiconductor stocks into NYSE listed financial stocks.
Biotech stocks appear to be forming a "head and
shoulder" formation, while internet stocks are
flat, and the only ones carrying the market are the
fiberoptic and networking stocks. Whether the narrowness
of the rallies that take place in Nasdaq continues or
not, is something we really have no way of predicting in
a quantitative way. However, we insist that if rallies
do not become broader, Nasdaq is headed for trouble not
too long from now.
CHARTS ARE VIEWABLE ONLY DURING THE CURRENT WEEK
"End Of The Week Market Update" for week
ending 7-28-00
We would like to offer an examination of both current
fundamental and technical condition of the market with
special focus on Nasdaq. But first, an overview of what
we have said over the past two months. In our May 4th
Newsletter we predicted that second quarter earnings
would be robust, but the market crash in April was
probably a prelude of what was looming ahead 4-6 months
down the road. We followed with our Newsletter in June,
in which we expressed serious doubts that the perception
of a slower economy ahead, was valid, and we further
said that if indeed the economy does slow in the second
half of the year, corporate earnings will be adversely
affected. We also pointed out that out of the 12 stocks
that had the biggest percentage moves, during the week
that Nasdaq advanced 19% in 4 days, 7 of them had NO
earnings, and the other 5 that did, their P/Es ranged
from 100 to 628! We implied, that the 4 day exuberant
rally was a speculative orgy all-over again and had
nothing to do with the actual state of the economy or
corporate earnings. Subsequently, in our July
Newsletter, we continued to express skepticism about how
much the economy had really slowed down, and we listed
the early warning signs that had revisited the market,
and their eerie similarities to the warning signs that
preceeded the colapse in April. The past two weeks, the
real data, finally confirmed the validity of our
opininon. Second quarter earnings were robust, but most
companies warned of lower profits in the second half of
the year. The GDP came at 5.2% far above the 3.8%
economists were expecting( the only surprised ones were
Wall Street economists, who are ALWAYS surprised to find
out how far off their forecasts were!), proving that the
economy not only it has not slowed but it is about to
re-accelerate its growth (thus the need for higher
interest rates) To put the pieces together, from a
fundamental point of view, the perception is again
changing form positive to negative. Higher interest
rates must again be re-considered in the valuation
equation, while at the same time, lower corporate
profits must be taken into account for the second half
of the year. Neither of these two factors is bullish for
stocks, at least for the near future. The market has not
fully discounted both factors. From a technical pont of
view, we would like you to take a look at the Nasdaq
cumulative volume, and Advance/Decline line(in our July
Newsletter we already showed all the non-confirming
indicators). As you can see very clearly, as the market
advanced from mid June to mid July. MOST stocks were
losing ground. The advance was being supported by an
ever decreasing number of high octane speculative
big-cap Nasdaq names such as BRCM, JNPR, BRCD, RBAK,
EXTR, etc. The problem with such a narrow rally, is that
at some point the last silly/greedy speculator has
bought with no-one else left to buy the same 75 stocks
over and over!(Anyone buying BRCM at $260 hoping it goes
to $500 -anytime soon- is comicaly silly, anyone buying
BRCM at $260 hoping to cash in on the next 40 points
advance -in the next two days- is both comicaly silly
and dangerously greedy!)The evidence, so far, indicates
that the rally from June to July, was a classic bear
market rally in a distribution phase. At the moment the
market is oversold and we expect a reflex rally next
week off Friday's lows, or, maybe from 100-150 points
lower. We believe short-term aggresive traders should go
long, on the other hand, intermediate term investors
should use the opportunity to further lighten up on
their holdings. We think -if the fundamental picture
remains hostile, and the perception remains negative,
the market may struggle for several more weeks. Also, we
would like to add, that we think Nasdaq more likely will
not violate the May lows, on the other hand, the Dow is
the most vulnerble.
CHARTS ARE VIEWABLE ONLY DURING THE CURRENT WEEK
"End Of The Week Market Update" for week
ending 7-7-00
We view the market's action this past week as rather
positive (especially the action in the SP500)Although it
is a bit too early -we think- to conclude that the FED
has achieved a "soft landing" all the data
that came out this week, pointed that way. Consumer
spending has slowed, housing has weakened, durable good
orders fell by 0.2% and job creation was miniscule. All
that is pointing to a economy growing at 4-4.5% annual
rate. The stock market, sensing that the FED is probably
done raising rates, responded by rallying during the
last part of the week. We think the rally in the SP500
was much stronger than the rally in Nasdaq. The rally in
Nasdaq was due to the rebound in the semiconductor
stocks -that were very oversold- but the majority of the
stocks did not participate. Both on Thursday and Friday,
there were only 250 net advances in Nasdaq. That makes
us a bit skeptical about the sustainability of the
rally. Our forecasting model, predicted two scenarios
with the highest probability of occurence over the next
5-7 days. We are cautiously bullish
CHARTS ARE VIEWABLE ONLY DURING THE CURRENT WEEK
|
|