|
In our March newsletter, we said "...
At the moment NASDAQ has technical support
(+/- 25 points) at 1750, 1600, 1500 and 1350.
Which one is going to hold? For now the
1750-1600 zone should provide -at least- a
temporary comfort zone, from which the market
will attempt to regroup. In our opinion, a sharp
“bear market” rally can not be that far from
here. Whether it starts from current levels, or
from lower ones, it does not matter, because in
either case it should be between 25%-35%, which
is a very respectable return..."
So, it should be no surprise to our readers,
that finally the market managed to put together
one decent week. The only surprise -to us- is
that it took as long as it did! Immediately,
"Bottomologists" (aka Wall Street
Chief Strategists) rushed to declare the bottom
of the bear market! We are open minded, and good
natured fellows, so, we would normally give them
the benefit of the doubt. However, these are the
same "experts" who have declared
-with much fanfare and little shame-
several bottoms, over the past six months! Thus,
we are a little hesitant to open the champagne
bottle. Let's examine what sparked the rally
last week. First was the announcement by
Amazon.com that the company will have lower
losses. We find it a waist of time to comment
too much on Amazon.com. However, we will say
this: neither Amazon.com is in any imminent
danger of becoming profitable, nor, its Chairman
Mr. Bezos, is in any imminent danger of becoming
credible and believable. If Amazon.com was the
fuel for the rally then SELL NOW while there is
still time! Second reason for the
rally, was Mr. Jonathan Joseph -the
semiconductor analyst at Smith Barney- who
upgraded the chip stocks. People paid attention,
because -to his credit- he was the first one to
downgrade them on 7-5-2000. We genuinely like
Mr. Joseph, so we will spend some time examining
his call. We think that exuberant
investors apparently forgot a few details. A)
His call -this time- was by his own admission,
due mostly to "anecdotal" evidence,
rather than any tangible signs of fundamental
improvement. Simply put, he thinks
"business can not get any worse" To a
large degree, we agree. However that does not
mean business is going to get a whole a lot
better either! B) We did a little exercise -the
results of which- are summarized in the table
below. We examined the price of some chip stocks
the day Mr. Joseph downgraded the chip sector
(7-5-00) and the gains the stocks experienced
after the downgrade, on average they gained 32%!
Obviously Mr. Joseph, was right, but a bit too
early. We think it is safe assumption, that even
if he is right (which would be the best case
scenario) he is probably just as early as
he was last year. So, take the price of the same
stocks on 4-9-01(the day before the upgrade),
subtract 32% and you get the picture!
(Worst case scenario, Mr. Joseph is simply wrong
this time, although very brave)
| Stock |
Price
7/5/00 |
High |
Gain |
Price
4-9-01 |
Low? |
| ALTR |
46 |
67
(9/1/00) |
45.65% |
21.3 |
11.55 |
| BRCM |
217 |
259
(8/24/00) |
19.80% |
24 |
19.5 |
| INTC |
65.7 |
75.6
98/24/00) |
15% |
23.2 |
19.75 |
| KLAC |
49 |
67.38
(9/1/00) |
37.5% |
34 |
21.25 |
| MXIM |
64.75 |
90
(9/1/00) |
39% |
35.35 |
21.5 |
| NVLS |
51.5 |
68.75
(7/17/00) |
33.4% |
36 |
24.12 |
| VTSS |
68 |
95
(8/28/00) |
39.7% |
18 |
10.8 |
| XLNX |
76 |
97.5
(7/17/00) |
28% |
31.4 |
19.5 |
| AVG. |
|
|
32% |
|
|
In
our humble opinion, the best leading indicator
of the health of the semiconductor sector, is
the Taiwanese dollar. The reason is this, due to
Taiwan's position -as a major producer of chips-
any industry- wide pick up in orders,
invariably causes the Taiwanese dollar to rise,
because chip buyers need to buy Taiwanese
dollars to pay for the chip purchases!
Unfortunately, we could not upload a chart of
the Taiwanese dollar, but we assure you it does not
confirm Mr. Joseph's belief that things can only
get better from here for the chip stocks.
Moreover, let's examine the message of the
equity markets, assuming that indeed the
bear market is over. Bear market are caused due
to poor fundamentals (just as bull markets are
caused due to improving fundamentals -or bubble
mentality) Thus, if indeed the bear market is
over, the implication for the economy is that
its fundamentals are about to improve as well.
That is where we have our doubts. In our view,
we have not seen even one indication that the
economy is about to turn around within the next
3-4 months. By now, it should be clear to
everyone -except of course the Federal Reserve-
that the economic slow down has to do more with
overcapacity, and less with just a temporary
build-up in inventories. It takes much longer to
grow into the added capacity, than it takes to
work off excess inventory. In addition, the
recent employment data, confirms that the only
hope to avert a recession -robust consumer
spending- is about to be curtailed, as the
employment picture gets more uncertain. In
our opinion, the coming economic data will show
that the second quarter, if not the first, will
mark the start of the recession. According to Mr.
Banerji who is the director of research for the Economic
Cycle Research Institute, http://www.businesscycle.com
in an article that appeared on The Street.com
on 4-7-01 "...growth in
the ECRI's Leading Employment Index plunged to a
19-year low in February: This suggests that the
labor markets will get much worse in the coming
months. And nothing can undermine confidence as
much as the loss of jobs. Ultimately, a
worsening job market will feed on itself,
causing a recession. As the chart shows, the
employment index is clearly at recessionary
levels..."
Source: ECONOMIC CYCLE RESEARCH
We
could not agree more, with Mr. Banerji and his
conclusions.
If that is not enough, we also
would like to add two other factors that, in our
opinion, will pose additional challenges to a
speedy economic recovery. The first factor, is
going to be higher energy prices during the
summer. Higher oil prices will negate the
benefits of lower interest rates Higher
oil prices hit both the consumer and the
corporate sector. The enormous capital
investment that corporations embarked on in the
90's was fueled both by healthy profits and
healthy financial markets. However, higher
energy costs are adversely affecting corporate
profits, forcing companies to reduce
capital investment. In order for the economy to
re-accelerate, corporations need to increase
capital spending, not reduce it! The second
factor that will impede a speedy recovery, is
actually a byproduct of the first. The
productivity increases of the past few years,
were without much doubt, due to the enormous
capital investment in IT technology. Since,
investment in IT has collapsed, so will the
productivity gains of the past few years.
Reduced productivity, will result in increased
costs and lower profits for U.S. firms, forcing
them to lay off more workers in order to boost
sagging profits and share
prices.
In conclusion, no one
can argue that we are in the middle of a
"trading rally" After all, NASDAQ has
rallied from an intra day low of 1620 to close
at 1961, that is a 21% advance, how can one
argue with that? We believe that this trading
rally, may have another 10%-15% left in it
before it expires. So, on a short-term basis we
think we should be long the market. However, as
far as, the bear market having ended, we think
there is no evidence to conclude that upon. The
end of the bear market will signal the
improvement of the fundamentals of the economy.
At the moment, all indicators are showing that
the economy is still deteriorating.
Our
Market Positions:
Dow: Trading
Buy,SP500:Trading Buy
NASDAQ:Trading Buy
|