|
"Hurrah" For The Market,
It's Back To Pre-Attack levels!
Sunday
10-14-01, 11:15am PST
Much
has been made in the media this past week over the fact that the popular
indexes have made it back to where they were before the attack on the WTC.
The implication of this accomplishment -according to the
"experts"- is that everything is fine and well, and we are just
witnessing the dawn of a brand new bull market!
First
of all let's examine the real implication of the market's spirited
accomplishment, shall we? On 9-10-01, the market was trying to cope with a
worsening economic, worsening corporate profits, and high valuations by
any historical standards. Industrial production had fallen for 11
consecutive months, unemployment was on the rise, hours worked had fallen,
foreclosures and bankruptcies were up, consumer confidence had been
falling, housing had started to roll over, with R.E. agents reporting
rising inventory, but no buyers. Then on 9-11-01 additional elements
were introduced: "event risk" due to the war on terrorism, and
the impact of such war, to the economy's long-term rate of growth. It is
no secret that "war" does a pretty good darn job in
re-allocating capital from productive investments to non-productive
investments, and thus depressing the long-term rate of economic growth.
Such a "macro" event impacts the returns of financial assets.
Since, Wall Street is more concerned about where the market is going in
the next hour, rather than in the next five years, it is understandable
that it is probably way too early to expect the Street to adjust its
"macro" view of the market, until it is too late. However,
something that anyone can grasp is the following: The decline following
the attack on the WTC, reflected -partly- the premium investors demanded
from the market due to "event-risk" by rallying back up to
pre-attack levels, the market is essentially saying that it no longer sees
a reason to for an additional risk premium on stocks, due to
"event-risk" The only logical conclusion is that the market sees
no "event-risk" ahead, and thus no need to demand a risk
premium. According to the President, and the FBI, there is still plenty of
risk around! Moreover, according to the U.S. government "this is a
multi-year effort" Meaning there is risk for years to come! There is
not one person on the face of the Earth -except Wall Street experts, who
believes that we have already eradicated the problem, and we have nothing
to be concerned with going forward. In other words, there
is still plenty of risk around, yet the market sees no reason to demand a
risk premium, that's the implication of the market's latest
accomplishment. Hurrah for idiocy!
Second,
the way markets behave, bears certain characteristics that constitute what
we call the "signature" of the behavior. Price action, when seen
in a vacuum, provides little information with regards to the true state of
the market. However, by examining the "signature" left behind by
the price action, we can draw a much better, and accurate conclusion. In
our weekly market analysis for week ending 10-12-01 you will find not one, or two, or three, but eighteen
(18) of our proprietary indicators which are designed to illustrate the
"signature" of the price action. Fifteen out of the eighteen,
show that the "signature" of the current rally, is the
exact, same, identical "signature" that was left by the
past eight bear market rallies of the last eighteen months.
Third,
some will say: "How about all the stimulus, and the liquidity coming
into the economy, isn't that going to help?" We do not dispute that
in the end, the U.S. economy will recover. However, we have no evidence
yet, that such recovery is indeed taking place. When we have solid
evidence, we will act upon it. The notion advocated by financial
charlatans in the media that "if you wait for evidence it will be too
late, the train will have left the station" is silly and
intellectually bankrupt! The same charlatans, have urged investors
to jump into the market during every one of the past eight bear market
rallies for the same reason. The market has rallied eight times in the
past 18 months because it anticipated a recovery that never materialized!
If investors had listened to the advise of the charlatans, and had gone
long, during any of those rallies, if they are still holding their
positions, they are sitting on huge losses. The best advise we can give is
this: you will miss nothing by waiting for some real evidence,
except perhaps portfolio losses, which we are sure you can live without.
Buying on hope, and neglecting reality is stupid. Below are the eight
rallies that were based on "hope" they have all resulted to
lower prices, and despair to those who bought them!
| Time Period |
Gain |
| 14-Apr-2000 to
01-May-2000 |
19.1% |
| 23-May-2000 to
17-Jul-2000 |
35.0% |
| 02-Aug-2000 to
01-Sep-2000 |
15.7% |
| 12-Oct-2000 to
20-Oct-2000 |
13.2% |
| 30-Nov-2000 to
11-Dec-2000 |
16.0% |
| 02-Jan-2001 to
24-Jan-2001 |
24.7% |
| 04-Apr-2001 to
22-May-2001 |
41.1% |
| 18-Jun-2001 to
29-Jun-2001 |
41.1% |
Fourth,
investors need to recognize that 20 some years of the greatest bull market
in our nation's history has produced an army of Wall Street
"experts" with a very large ego, and very little, or no, actual
talent and market knowledge at all! In our April newsletter we took issue
with one of the Street's best, brightest, most celebrated , and of
course highest paid semiconductor analysts, Mr. Jonathan Joseph, of Smith
Barney. The omnipotent Mr. Joseph had just upgraded the entire
semiconductor sector, and his upgrade had partially fueled the rally in
semiconductor stocks in the April-May period. In that newsletter we wrote:
|
"...Second
reason for the rally, was Mr. Jonathan Joseph -the
semiconductor analyst at Smith Barney- who upgraded the chip stocks.
People paid attention, because -to his credit- he was the first one
to downgrade them on 7-5-2000. We genuinely like Mr. Joseph, so we
will spend some time examining his call. We think that
exuberant investors apparently forgot a few details. A) His call
-this time- was by his own admission, due mostly to
"anecdotal" evidence, rather than any tangible signs of
fundamental improvement. Simply put, he thinks "business can
not get any worse" To a large degree, we agree. However that
does not mean business is going to get a whole a lot better either!
B) We did a little exercise -the results of which- are summarized in
the table below. We examined the price of some chip stocks the day
Mr. Joseph downgraded the chip sector (7-5-00) and the gains the
stocks experienced after the downgrade, on average they gained 32%!
Obviously Mr. Joseph, was right, but a bit too early. We think it is
safe assumption, that even if he is right (which would be the best
case scenario) he is probably just as early as he was last
year. So, take the price of the same stocks on 4-9-01(the day before
the upgrade), subtract 32% and you get the picture! (Worst
case scenario, Mr. Joseph is simply wrong this time, although very
brave)
| Stock |
Price
7/5/00 |
High |
Gain |
Price
4-9-01 |
Low? |
| ALTR |
46 |
67
(9/1/00) |
45.65% |
21.3 |
11.55 |
| BRCM |
217 |
259
(8/24/00) |
19.80% |
24 |
19.5 |
| INTC |
65.7 |
75.6
98/24/00) |
15% |
23.2 |
19.75 |
| KLAC |
49 |
67.38
(9/1/00) |
37.5% |
34 |
21.25 |
| MXIM |
64.75 |
90
(9/1/00) |
39% |
35.35 |
21.5 |
| NVLS |
51.5 |
68.75
(7/17/00) |
33.4% |
36 |
24.12 |
| VTSS |
68 |
95
(8/28/00) |
39.7% |
18 |
10.8 |
| XLNX |
76 |
97.5
(7/17/00) |
28% |
31.4 |
19.5 |
| AVG. |
|
|
32% |
|
|
In
our humble opinion, the best leading indicator of the health of the
semiconductor sector, is the Taiwanese dollar. The reason is this,
due to Taiwan's position -as a major producer of chips- any
industry- wide pick up in orders, invariably causes the
Taiwanese dollar to rise, because chip buyers need to buy Taiwanese
dollars to pay for the chip purchases! Unfortunately, we could not
upload a chart of the Taiwanese dollar, but we assure you it does
not confirm Mr. Joseph's belief that things can only get better from
here for the chip stocks..."
(If
you wish to read the entire newsletter, click here
, Report #20, "Not So Fast" Posted 4-14-01)
|
Let's
take a look how the same semiconductor stocks fared following Mr. Joseph's
"upgrade" on the entire sector. (Mr. Joseph did not actually
upgrade these stocks, he upgraded the entire sector, we just used them for
the purpose of illustration)
|
Stock |
Date |
Price Low |
Price 4-9 |
Loss since "upgrade" on 4-9-01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALTR |
10/02 |
15.15 |
21.3 |
-28.87% |
|
BRCM |
10/02 |
18.8 |
24 |
-21.67% |
|
INTC |
09/21 |
18.96 |
23.2 |
-18.28% |
|
KLAC |
10/02 |
29.21 |
34 |
-14.09% |
|
MXIM |
10/02 |
32.8 |
35.35 |
-7.21% |
|
NVLS |
10/02 |
26.15 |
36 |
-27.36% |
|
VTSS |
09/27 |
6.65 |
18 |
-63.06% |
|
XLNX |
09/27 |
19.52 |
31.4 |
-37.83% |
|
AVERAGE LOSS |
|
|
|
27.29% |
|
SOX
Index |
10/2 |
350 |
455 |
-22.00% |
On
average, they lost 27.29%, the
SOX Index lost 22.00%, Hurrah for Mr. Jonathan Joseph, and his high
paid brethren!
The
purpose of revisiting the subject, is neither to congratulate ourselves,
nor, to "thrash" Mr. Joseph further, it is to demonstrate to
investors "beyond reasonable doubt" why buying on
"hope" instead of "evidence" can be hazardous to their
financial health.
Keep
the above example in mind, while the market is rallying again on
"hope" and the same familiar charlatans are urging you to buy
"before the train leaves the station!"
|