(11-24-03)
The indices rallied sharply, while all of our indicators also
turned up, suggesting that we ought to see continuation. We
really don't have much more to add today, other than, if there
is no continuation in the next two days, it will be a clear sign
that the markets are not getting a continuous infusion of
liquidity, and thus, today's rally was just a one day event.
(11-19-03)
The markets rallied from the levels that the bulls have been
able to make a stand since March. The question is; how much
firepower they have -in terms of available liquidity for stock
purchases- Do they have enough to support a new up-leg, or, do
they have just enough for a bounce? We will find out shortly. If
the indices are about to start a new leg to the upside, they
should be able to overcome resistance at their most recent
highs, with ease. Otherwise, we'll see a failure in the
9750-9800 zone for the Dow, in the 1052-1054 zone for the SP,
and in the 1945-1955 zone for NASDAQ. To put it clearly, the
rally will fail BEFORE the indices make contact with their
respective first upside targets, shown in the table below.
(11-18-03)
The markets sold off modestly, due to investors' heightened
concerns about the simultaneous strong price action by gold and
oil, and the dollar's penetration of support. You may recall
that in our weekly report, we discussed this matter in
detail. For the moment there are two areas that investors
need to focus, in order to avoid getting confused by all the
noise. First, with the exception of NASDAQ, all the other
indices have not violated support, which is still positive.
Second, in order to get a decline of larger magnitude and
duration than the ones the market has treated us with since
March, the background must cease to be bullish. Right now all
the indicators are in the vicinity from which the bulls have
been able to assume complete control of the market, and drive it
higher. Therefore, if the "environment" is still
bullish, then the bulls ought to be able to gain control of the
market and drive it higher once again. However, if the
"environment" has changed, then the bulls will be
unable to take over, and drive prices higher. So, in the next
2-4 trading days, watch to see if the markets will act in
the same manner that they have acted, every time the indicators
reached the same levels since March. If the first downside
targets are not reached, or, penetrated and the markets turn
around and begin to rally on strong volume and breadth, that
should be a clue that NOTHING HAS CHANGED, the bull is still
alive and well, and we just had another 3-4 day decline, enough
to get people excited about the return of the bear market, only
to see higher highs soon after! On the other hand, if the first
downside targets are taken out solidly, and the markets are
unable to muster a rally accompanied by strong breadth and
volume -as it has been the case since March- then that should be
our clue that SOMETHING HAS CHANGED, the bears finally
gained control.
(11-17-03)
The indices gapped down at the opening, violating their 21 DMAs,
but they rallied strongly after making contact with their 50
DMAs, managing to close in "no man's land" above the
50, but below the 21 DMA. Moreover, we don't have yet
either a break-down (see charts on page 1, channel support is
still holding) and obviously we still don't have a break-out
either. Thus, the "uncoiling" and the break out of the
apex that we talked about in the weekly report, has NOT occurred
yet. Consequently, we ought to remain neutral, until support,
or, resistance is solidly taken out, thereby providing
confirmation of either a break-out, or, a break-down. With
regards to tomorrow, given the indices are stuck between their
21 and 50 DMAs, they can go either way. There is something that
we would like to share with you, because we find it particularly
interesting. Notice that the last three bottoms in the
Quantifier, have occurred at higher levels, forming a rising
support line. The Quantifiers measure the overall technical
condition of the market, thus, by making higher lows, they are
telling us that each of the past 3 lows, has occurred with
improving technicals underneath it! Moreover, the McClellan
Oscillator is already at the bottom of its range, only after two
days of downside action. What does all that mean?
Similar observations in the past 15 years, have resulted 66% of
the time in a false break down, which is followed by the real
break out to the upside. Please understand
that this is not a forecast, we are simply sharing with you our
observations over the years, in our effort to keep you fully
aware of all the possibilities that may lie ahead. Pay attention
to the support/resistance levels listed on the table, and if the
markets break down, wait until the next day to see if there is
follow thru, before initiating positions.
(11-13-03)
Today's action ought to be classified as
"consolidation." Given that the overall trend is still
up, the odds ought to be better than even, that the
consolidation will turn out to be a bullish one, resulting in
another push to the upside. At the same time we need to remain
cognizant of the many divergences, and the market's inability to
make progress, despite decent news, supportive of the bullish
case. In summary, we continue to view the overall market
picture as neutral with a slight positive bias, but one, whose
risk level has risen. PAY ATTENTION TO THE SUPPORT/RESISTANCE
levels shown in the table below.
(11-12-03)
The bulls were able to mount an offensive at a critical point,
demonstrating that they are still in control, and confirming our
expectation (see comments for 11-10-03)
that we'll get a bounce. The question is; how much higher can
they take the indices from today's close? Take a look at the
hourly chart and the McClellan Oscillator for NASDAQ. We got
hourly resistance at 2005, at the same time, if we got the same
a/d ratio tomorrow, as we did today, the Oscillator will reach
the declining tops line. Given that NASDAQ has been the leading
index, we want to concentrate on its action tomorrow, especially
after the release of "good news" by AMAT, the
management of which, declared after the close that
"tech has turned the corner." Thus, for tomorrow's
trading we need to pay attention to the 1995-2005 zone, watch
out for a gap at the opening and a reversal. If that doesn't
happen, expect the bulls to maintain control of the market going
into next week.
(11-11-03)
The markets consolidated in a somewhat bearish fashion. Two of
the major indices (Dow, NASDAQ) closed marginally below support,
while breadth and up/down volume were negative by a margin of
2:1. The weak price action, weak breadth and on-going
divergences suggest more weakness in the short term. However,
the bulls have one more chance to show that they are still in
control; the McClellan Oscillator is at support, logically
the bulls ought to be able to mount an offensive move here. If
they don't, then it would become almost certain that the first
downside targets will be visited within the next 1-3 trading
days.
(11-10-03)
Today's decline wasn't much
of a surprise, given Friday's reversal. Moreover, we got the
McClellan Oscillators, the Thrust Oscillators, and the Buy/Sell
Indexes, all turn down, implying more weakness in the short
term. Having said all that, we also need to note that a) the
indices closed right at their 20 DMAs, and b) the McClellan
Oscillators went penetrated the zero line, there is a strong
tendency for the indices to bounce off their 20 DMAs, and for
the Oscillators to re-test the zero line, which means we can't
rule out a bounce tomorrow. Moreover, as long as the indices do
not close below the first downside targets (see table below) the
trend is still up. Our belief is, ALL ELSE BEING EQUAL (in other
words, in the absence of an exogenous event that changes the
current market dynamics) if the indices continue to
decline for another 2-3 trading days, we'll see another tradable
rally, due to the fact that inflows still exceed outflows
(mutual funds took in 5b during the first week of November)
lasting between 6-9 trading days.
(11-6-03)
The indices continued to consolidate, rallying into the close
towards the upper boundary of the consolidation zone, as traders
decided to position themselves bullishly, betting on a
break out to the upside tomorrow, resulting from a positive
employment report. The report will probably be a catalyst
that will move the market, however our position remains the
same: As far as traders are
concerned, the key thing to do, is pay attention to the
upper/lower boundaries of the consolidation zone for each index.
(11-5-03)
The indices are consolidating in a tight range, given that the
larger trend is up, one ought to expect the resolution of the
consolidation to be on the upside. At the same time, the
negative divergences, and the TOs along with the BSEs
turning down, suggest that caution is warranted, and any upside
resolution may be limited in magnitude. As far traders are
concerned, the key thing to do is pay attention to the
upper/lower boundaries of the consolidation zone for each index.
(11-4-03)
Today's decline is meaningless unless there is follow thru
tomorrow that results in a close below support (see numbers in
blue in the table below) We do want to be cognizant of the
fact that both the Thrust Oscillator, and the Buy/Sell Index,
appear to be losing steam, but until they turn down, and the
indices close below support, the trend is still UP. Can the
rally suddenly abort? YES, Why? Because the RYDEX readings are in
SELL territory, and b) the current rally started
without the McClellan Summation Index having gone below the 1000
level.
(11-3-03)
The indices closed above zone resistance confirming the
short-term bias to be on the upside. All else being equal, from
here we got to expect a test of resistance, and in all
likelihood a run to the first upside targets by Wednesday. We will re-evaluate from there. For now, the bulls are
still in control, until proven otherwise, although tomorrow can
easily be a down day. Having said all that,
we do want to keep in mind that a) the RYDEX readings are in
SELL territory, and b) given that the current rally started
without the McClellan Summation Index having gone below the 1000
level, the odds for an abrupt termination are better than even.